Post by xyz3700 on Feb 27, 2024 12:09:04 GMT 2
The Senate Constitution and Justice Committee approved this Wednesday (22/5) the inclusion of personal data protection in the list of fundamental guarantees of the Federal Constitution. The text now goes to the Plenary. Istockphoto Senate CCJ approves project that extends guarantees of privacy protection to the protection of personal data When defending the approval of the proposal, the rapporteur, senator Simone Tebet (MDB-MS), commented that doctrine and jurisprudence already recognize that the right to privacy goes beyond the protection of intimate life. "There are infraconstitutional norms, such as the Marco Civil da Internet and its regulation (Decree 8,771, of 2015); and the General Data Protection Law, advances that would need to be consolidated by this constitutional change", she states.
Authored by senator Eduardo Gomes (MDB-TO), the proposal states that the protection of personal data is a continuation of the protection of privacy. According to the senator, the project follows a line already adopted by several countries. "Privacy has been the starting point for discussions and regulations of this nature, but given its peculiarities, there is already a glimpse of value autonomy around the protection of personal data, in a way that even deserves to become a Chinese Malaysia Phone Number List constitutional right assured", says Eduardo Gomes.Exactly in these terms, SUSEP Circular no. 553, of, namely art. 5th., by defining that “in RC D & O insurance, the insurance company guarantees to the insured, when held responsible for damages caused to third parties, as a result of culpable illicit acts carried out in the exercise of the functions for which they have been appointed, elected and/or contractors.
The exclusion of coverage for intentional conduct is highlighted in the definitions, whose art. 3rd., inc. XVII, emphasizes that “ the insurance guarantee does not apply in cases where the damage caused to third parties results from intentional illicit acts, that is, committed by the insured with proven intent or serious negligence .As the individual entrepreneur's assets are confused with that of his company, there is no need to initiate an incident of disregard of the legal personality to execute his assets. Therefore, the 11th Civil Chamber of the Rio Grande do Sul Court of Justice amended the order that rejected the business succession request. The rapporteur of the appeal, judge Guinther Spode, said that creditors can collect their credits both through the expropriation of the assets of the individual company and the entrepreneur.
Authored by senator Eduardo Gomes (MDB-TO), the proposal states that the protection of personal data is a continuation of the protection of privacy. According to the senator, the project follows a line already adopted by several countries. "Privacy has been the starting point for discussions and regulations of this nature, but given its peculiarities, there is already a glimpse of value autonomy around the protection of personal data, in a way that even deserves to become a Chinese Malaysia Phone Number List constitutional right assured", says Eduardo Gomes.Exactly in these terms, SUSEP Circular no. 553, of, namely art. 5th., by defining that “in RC D & O insurance, the insurance company guarantees to the insured, when held responsible for damages caused to third parties, as a result of culpable illicit acts carried out in the exercise of the functions for which they have been appointed, elected and/or contractors.
The exclusion of coverage for intentional conduct is highlighted in the definitions, whose art. 3rd., inc. XVII, emphasizes that “ the insurance guarantee does not apply in cases where the damage caused to third parties results from intentional illicit acts, that is, committed by the insured with proven intent or serious negligence .As the individual entrepreneur's assets are confused with that of his company, there is no need to initiate an incident of disregard of the legal personality to execute his assets. Therefore, the 11th Civil Chamber of the Rio Grande do Sul Court of Justice amended the order that rejected the business succession request. The rapporteur of the appeal, judge Guinther Spode, said that creditors can collect their credits both through the expropriation of the assets of the individual company and the entrepreneur.